The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Leaders of this Women’s March were concerned it would be ‘overwhelmingly white.’ So they canceled it.

The march in Humboldt County, Calif., was scheduled for Jan. 19

By
January 2, 2019 at 11:55 a.m. EST

Adapted from a story by The Washington Post’s Michael Brice-Saddler.

Ever since its inaugural march in 2017, the Women’s March has been saddled with divisive discussions about race. That controversy is currently playing out in Humboldt County, Calif., where a Women’s March group has canceled its January rally over concerns that its participants would be “overwhelmingly white.”

Organizers of the 2019 Eureka Women’s March, originally scheduled for Jan. 19, said in a statement that the decision came after numerous conversations with leading local activists and supporters of the march.

“Up to this point, the participants have been overwhelmingly white, lacking representation from several perspectives in our community,” the Facebook statement read. “Instead of pushing forward with crucial voices absent, the organizing team will take time for more outreach.”

The Eureka group, which does not appear to be an official California chapter of the Women’s March, said it was “exploring holding an event in March to celebrate International Women’s Day,” which is celebrated on March 8. It also encouraged local supporters to attend a separate celebration on Martin Luther King Jr. Day on Jan. 21.

“Our goal is that planning will continue and we will be successful in creating an event that will build power and community engagement through connection between women that seek to improve the lives of all in our community,” the statement read.

Census Bureau data from July shows that Humboldt County is about 74 percent non-Hispanic white. Eureka Women’s March organizers did not respond to an email or phone call Sunday morning requesting comment on the decision.

Demonstrators gathered on Jan. 20, at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial to rally for women's rights, a year after President Trump took office. (Video: Lindsey Sitz, Hannah Jewell, Elyse Samuels/The Washington Post, Photo: Salwan Georges/The Washington Post)

This is not the first time the Women’s March movement has faced questions about its racial makeup and inclusiveness.

In recent months, the Women’s March has tried to quell controversy surrounding its leadership. Some regional chapters have distanced themselves from the national group and its leaders, who have been called to step down over ties with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan and accusations of anti-Semitism.

In a November Facebook post, Women’s March founder Teresa Shook called for the resignations of national co-chairs Bob Bland, Tamika Mallory, Carmen Perez and Linda Sarsour, adding that they have “steered the Movement away from its true course.”

Mallory, in particular, was criticized after she attended the Nation of Islam’s annual Saviours' Day event in Chicago this year, at which Farrakhan made statements about “powerful Jews” who he considered his enemies.

“In opposition to our Unity Principles, they have allowed anti-Semitism, anti-LBGTQIA sentiment and hateful, racist rhetoric to become a part of the platform by their refusal to separate themselves from groups that espouse these racist, hateful beliefs,” Shook wrote. “I call for the current Co-Chairs to step down and to let others lead who can restore faith in the Movement and its original intent.”

The Women’s March will return to Washington and other cities on Jan. 19.

Marissa Lang contributed to this report.