Given Brett Kavanaugh’s contentious Supreme Court confirmation, the spotlight’s on two moderate Republican senators: Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine.
In Collins’s case, liberal activists are ratcheting up the heat. They presented the senator with an ultimatum: Vote for Kavanaugh, and we’ll spend $1 million to fund whomever decides to challenge you in 2020.
Using fundraising platform Crowdpac, Maine People’s Alliance, Mainers for Accountable Leadership and activist Ady Barkan had raised more than $1 million from 37,000 pledges as of Tuesday.
“Senator Collins votes NO on Kavanaugh and you will not be charged, and no money will go to fund her future opponent,” the platform notes. “Senator Collins votes YES on Kavanaugh and your pledge will go to her opponent’s campaign, once that opponent has been identified.”
The tone of the Crowdpac listing was alternately threatening and encouraging.
“The people of Maine are asking you to be a hero, Senator Collins,” it noted, while warning that if she failed “to stand up for the people of Maine and for Americans across the country, every dollar donated to this campaign will go to your eventual Democratic opponent in 2020. We will get you out of office.”
Collins has a reputation as a centrist though she is a mostly reliable Republican voter. She already backed Kavanaugh once, when he was nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals by George W. Bush in 2006, and she has been sending strong signals that she will back him again this time around. After a meeting with him in August that she described as “excellent,” she said that he told her he agreed that Roe v. Wade was settled as a precedent of the court.
The activists’ efforts, while attention-grabbing, could backfire.
At least one ethics expert consulted by The Washington Post said that it may very well violate federal bribery statutes, which prohibit giving or offering anything of value to government officials in exchange for any acts or votes. And Collins issued a sharply worded response through a spokeswoman that called it an attempt at extortion.
“And anybody who thinks these tactics would work on Senator Collins obviously doesn’t know her,” spokeswoman Annie Clark said in a statement. “Senator Collins will make up her mind based on the merits of the nomination. Threats or other attempts to bully her will not play a factor in her decision making whatsoever.”
Adav Noti, a senior director at the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center, which works on rules of ethics and finance in government, told The Post that he thought the listing was illegal, noting that bribery is a federal crime.
“I think they’re playing a game to avoid the literal application of the bribery statute,” he said. “They have structured the campaign in a way that the action they will do if she does what she wants is that they will refund the money but that seems to be a fictional distinction. It still seems like they’re saying if you don’t do what we want we will spend $1 million and that strikes me as just as much as an inducement as saying we’ll give you $1 million if you do what we want.”
Other organizations that work at the intersection of money politics disagreed.
“It seems kind of icky but it doesn’t rise to the level of bribery because there’s no agreement,” Jordan Libowitz, a spokesman for the Citizens for Ethics and Responsibilities. “It’s just the way money and politics tend to work these days.”
Marie Follayttar, the co-director of Mainers for Accountable Leadership, denounced Collins’ claims in a statement sent to The Washington Post.
“The idea of Susan Collins attacking an effort by 35,000 small dollar donors as bribery is politics at its worst. Thousands of Mainers are trying desperately to tell her that she needs to protect abortion access and critical healthcare coverage across the country by voting ‘no’ on Kavanaugh,” Follayttar said. “If she doesn’t, we absolutely have the right to prepare to unseat her given everything Judge Kavanaugh would do on the Supreme Court to make life worse for Maine women, Mainers with pre-existing conditions and Mainers who care about fabric of our democracy. Unlike Supreme Court judges, Senators do not enjoy a lifetime guarantee of their seat; they are accountable to the people.”
Barkan questioned the way that elected officials fundraise and the effect it had on their votes.